October 16, 2003
10:04 AM
10:04 AM
I've gotta work on those numbers.
I'm not sure I believe in the algorithm being used, though. According to the Gematriculator, I'm 42% evil, my friend SarahScott is 47% evil (getting closer), Talon is only 30% evil (yah right), and in an unnerving display of synchronicity, Kate is also exactly 42% evil. The real proof that this thing is faulty, though, is that Nick is only 17% evil. Anybody who's ever met Nick knows that can't be right.
(Thanks, Tink!)
Update: Since posting about the Gematriculator, my numbers have jumped up to 51% evil. I guess the taint of the Gematriculator was enough to put me over the edge. Mwa ha ha ha.
My site is 84% evil, 16% good. Which is funny since I thought it was the other way around. What the hell am I putting up there??!??!?!?
Geoff,
Further proof that the Gematriculator is incorrect: my site is 94% good, 6% evil. Not exactly what you'd expect, eh?
-Tink
Maybe we should just invert the numbers?
I came in at 35% evil.
And after posting about it, my evil number is dropping.
I think frankly, the thing's just an effort at self-promotion.
'Cause I know I'm a hell of a lot more evil than that!